|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
bloglife
contact
This work is dedicated to the Public Domain.
[[elsewhere]]
creative commons licenses
disinformation | be @ evryday
infoshop
new left review
cicifoo
letusplay
luka nova
mushimushi
truth of today/zen without
zbiejczuk
adaweb
bootlab
computerfinearts collection
ctheory
cyberpipe
d+g rhizomat
distributive justice
dyne.org
ECF
edge
eyebeam
foo bar
huetopic
if ( 1 1 == 1 ) { e8z = true; }
ljudmila!:)
makrolab
mama
open democracy
opus commons
radioqualia
rhizome
scanline
skylined
surface.yugop
teleportacia
ageema blues
egoboobits
lackluster
matthew herbert
mille plateaux
electric sheep screen-saver
[[before]]
01 / 2005
10 / 2004
07 / 2004
06 / 2004
05 / 2004
04 / 2004
02 / 2004
01 / 2004
12 / 2003
11 / 2003
10 / 2003
09 / 2003
08 / 2003
07 / 2003
06 / 2003
05 / 2003
04 / 2003
03 / 2003
02 / 2003
01 / 2003
12 / 2002
11 / 2002
10 / 2002
09 / 2002
08 / 2002
07 / 2002
| » 02/08/2002 |
¶ north was impressive. it was in germanic lands @ three locations: documenta in kassel, mathew barney in koln and manifesta in frankfurt.
these were three totally different projects of cultural production in the context of contemporary art.
personally i was having great time with tsotso. we were upersuper company capable to consume, reflect and criticize the approaches and the results.
short review for me and for you:
platform 5 is documenta 11 exhibition which is notably fair and important for its content but inaccurate at choosing the artists and placing the whole thing up. the content was about - according to four previous platforms - democracy unrealized, experiments with the thruth, creolite and creolization and under the siege: four african cities. thus we were able to see many works about refugee existentialsm, izrael-palestine continuous misunderstanding, mexican border terror, sorrow and tragedy of everydays... however we are all here to know it and to redifne it over and over again, until we reach __________ .
but unfortunatly these works were shown like allienated art pieces in some highart hostile museums while they were talking about topics closely surrounding us on all levels of our daily activities. the impact of technology was definitively missing and ricardo dominguez with the zapatista project was not there either. so the shortest resume possible is 50 % of amazing creativity and good research projects nonreferring with the classical curatorial aprroach and its disabillity to bind art content and its institutionalisation.
manifesta was on the other hand very relaxive and the works were much more simple but still trickling through and critical. the impact of the whole as the project from artists to curators for the viewers was consistent and exact in terms of recent rhizomatic structures deriving from production, life, organization and the web. the playground of criticism achieved the mindstorming goal for everyone that can let it go.
at the end i'm just mentioning matthew barney's sunday movie show. nothing really to think. it looks like fascinating but extremly boring costume art with weirdness as the high end of a whole story. biogenetic? no way. decorative? yes. i dont get it as weel as i will like to touch it but i can't cause its art!? :-0 he is bytheway the intimate friend of bjork and like lada said the question is not why he is with her but why she is with him. here we go mish-mash tric-trac ...
leaving soon again.
(11:28)
want to say something on the topic? do so here:
these were three totally different projects of cultural production in the context of contemporary art.
personally i was having great time with tsotso. we were upersuper company capable to consume, reflect and criticize the approaches and the results.
short review for me and for you:
platform 5 is documenta 11 exhibition which is notably fair and important for its content but inaccurate at choosing the artists and placing the whole thing up. the content was about - according to four previous platforms - democracy unrealized, experiments with the thruth, creolite and creolization and under the siege: four african cities. thus we were able to see many works about refugee existentialsm, izrael-palestine continuous misunderstanding, mexican border terror, sorrow and tragedy of everydays... however we are all here to know it and to redifne it over and over again, until we reach __________ .
but unfortunatly these works were shown like allienated art pieces in some highart hostile museums while they were talking about topics closely surrounding us on all levels of our daily activities. the impact of technology was definitively missing and ricardo dominguez with the zapatista project was not there either. so the shortest resume possible is 50 % of amazing creativity and good research projects nonreferring with the classical curatorial aprroach and its disabillity to bind art content and its institutionalisation.
manifesta was on the other hand very relaxive and the works were much more simple but still trickling through and critical. the impact of the whole as the project from artists to curators for the viewers was consistent and exact in terms of recent rhizomatic structures deriving from production, life, organization and the web. the playground of criticism achieved the mindstorming goal for everyone that can let it go.
at the end i'm just mentioning matthew barney's sunday movie show. nothing really to think. it looks like fascinating but extremly boring costume art with weirdness as the high end of a whole story. biogenetic? no way. decorative? yes. i dont get it as weel as i will like to touch it but i can't cause its art!? :-0 he is bytheway the intimate friend of bjork and like lada said the question is not why he is with her but why she is with him. here we go mish-mash tric-trac ...
leaving soon again.
(11:28)
want to say something on the topic? do so here: