![]() ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| |
||| melon 'n lemon |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| | |
|
[[inside]] bloglife contact ![]() This work is dedicated to the Public Domain. [[elsewhere]] creative commons licenses disinformation | be @ evryday infoshop new left review cicifoo letusplay luka nova mushimushi truth of today/zen without zbiejczuk adaweb bootlab computerfinearts collection ctheory cyberpipe d+g rhizomat distributive justice dyne.org ECF edge eyebeam foo bar huetopic if ( 1 1 == 1 ) { e8z = true; } ljudmila!:) makrolab mama open democracy opus commons radioqualia rhizome scanline skylined surface.yugop teleportacia ageema blues egoboobits lackluster matthew herbert mille plateaux electric sheep screen-saver [[before]] 01 / 2005 10 / 2004 07 / 2004 06 / 2004 05 / 2004 04 / 2004 02 / 2004 01 / 2004 12 / 2003 11 / 2003 10 / 2003 09 / 2003 08 / 2003 07 / 2003 06 / 2003 05 / 2003 04 / 2003 03 / 2003 02 / 2003 01 / 2003 12 / 2002 11 / 2002 10 / 2002 09 / 2002 08 / 2002 07 / 2002 |
[[ logcomm on entry 20030203122854 ]]
¶ in the middle of work. searching for some bios. sometimes i think art history is about biographies of people. it seems so ticklish to work with people's data - the process of input and output. in the meantime i find another great initiative. they are active since the early 1994. lineart makes me think of becoming exclusive at my work as a curator. i want all digital art to be exclusively made in an open attitude. besides it was not so rarely that i have read an idea about the art that could be our everyday troubleshooter. although i think this is way too much idealistic, i still think it's worth to act like this. also radical activism can look like 'useless' but on the contrary we would still be living in a feudalistic society. however, i am aware that after this proprietary age we won't live in a better place but just different. there will always be dark side of the moon and sunny side of the alps. black and white - the eternal coexistence. (12:28) luke : ehey, how about being exclusive by inclusivity? the other day when we talked about open.source, gpl, copyleft and linux, i suddenly realised that i'm demanding something from my friends that they don't want or cannot do. do i have the right to condemn acts of a friend that has no patience to download and install .ogg plugin for winamp? do i, with seeing this as the only "right" option, become exclusivistic? potiho : "possibility of choice" potiho : I = 0 ClaireWallace < jennifermartinez at mail15.com > : I had got a dream to make my business, but I did not earn enough amount of cash to do this. Thank goodness my dude suggested to take the home loans. Thus I took the secured loan and realized my desire. want to say something on the topic? do so here: | |
| powered by tsocode-lite | ||